Skip to main content

Do I Have to File an H-1B Amendment for My Employee Who Is Changing Worksite Locations?

                
Earlier this year USCIS clarified when an H-1B amendment is required when an H-1B employee changes worksite locations.

In the critical portion of its decision, Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC, the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office held that employers are required to file an H-1B amendment when the H-1B employee changes his or her place of employment to a worksite location outside of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The Simeio holding took effect on August 19, 2015.

USCIS considers the change in the worksite location outside the MSA to be material change of the Labor Condition Application (LCA). As a prerequisite to employing an H-1B worker, the employer must submit a receive a certified LCA from the Department of Labor, which ensures that employers pay H-1B employees the higher of either the prevailing wage for the occupational classification in the “area of employment” or the actual wage paid by the employer to other employees with similar experience and qualifications who are performing the same services in accordance with federal immigration law.  

USCIS states, “[t]he LCA certification process is intended to protect United States workers’ wages by eliminating economic incentives or advantages in hiring temporary foreign workers. It also ensures that wages paid to H-1B employees are in line with the wages paid by similarly situated workers in their same geographical area.”

For example the average annual base salary of a software engineer with a Bachelor’s degree and one to three years of experience working in San Jose, California will be higher than a similarly experienced software engineer working in Dubuque, Iowa. The MSA requirement portion of the LCA takes this economic reality into account.

The Simeio decision sets forth a logical requirement to ensure the purposes of the Labor Condition Application continue to be achieved no matter where the H-1B employee works. H-1B employers must file an amended H-1B petition for their H-1B employees who change their place of employment to a worksite location outside of MSA provided in the existing approved H-1B petition. 

Transferring employees may begin working at the new job location as soon as the amendment is filed and they do not have to wait for the amendment to be approved. Also, USCIS has stated that H-1B employers are not required to file an amendment if the new worksite is within the same MSA; the H-1B employee will only be working at the new location for a short period of time (30-60 days); or if the employee is going to work at non-worksite location for a seminar, conference, or short off-site assignment. 

Employers with H-1B employers should consult an immigration attorney to decide whether filing an H-1B amendment is required to accommodate a change of work location for their H-1B employee.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

U.S. Recognizes Five-year Extensions of Venezuelan Passport

Venezuelans received welcome news this last month when the National Assembly published a decree signed by Interim President Juan Guaido on May 21, to extend the validity of Venezuelan passports for an additional five years past their printed date of expiration. The U.S. Department of State issued a  statement ,recognizing this extension for visa issuance and consular process. They also stated that Customs and Border Patrol would recognize this decree. Obtaining a valid Venezuelan passport has been a difficult, if not impossible, task that has been a source of much concern for those seeking visas to the U.S. or have pending applications for immigration benefits. This decree will allow those currently holding a Venezuelan passport that has expired to automatically add 5 years of validity from the expiration date. While this statement can provide much needed assurance, we recommend that Venezuelans who are currently applying for an immigration benefit, including travel to the U.S. w