Skip to main content

5 Goals of Legislators Who Are Pushing for EB-5 Visa Reform

The EB-5 visa program was designed to stimulate the U.S. economy and to encourage job creation in rural and low-employment areas. Although the program has been effective, a recent report from Breitbart News identifies several cases of fraud related to the EB-5 program.


Reform has been elusive despite bipartisan efforts to reduce fraud. According to the news site VTDigger, Senators Patrick Leahy and Chuck Grassley recently testified before the House of Representatives regarding the various issues with the EB-5 program. Leahy, who had once championed the program, pointed out several potential improvements that could reduce fraud and abuse:

1.     Prevent the formation of Targeted Employment Areas through gerrymandering;
2.     Increase the minimum investment requirements;
3.     Adequately vet the funds invested through the EB-5 program;
4.     Ensure jobs created by the EB-5 program are verifiable; and
5.     Enhance federal oversight regarding the establishment of regional centers.

The EB-5 program has been reauthorized until at least September 30, which marks the end of the 2017 fiscal year. Whether the program will be reformed before that date or authorized to continue afterward is uncertain, but entrepreneurs who are interested in obtaining EB-5 visas would be wise to start the process sooner rather than later.

If you have questions about the EB-5 visa program, contact Kuck Immigration Partners. Attorney Charles Kuck will help you navigate the murky waters of U.S. immigration laws. Call 404-816-8611 to schedule a consultation with an employment visa lawyer in Atlanta.

Specific Reforms Proposed by Senator Patrick Leahy

Sen. Leahy has become a figurehead for EB-5 visa reform, but his efforts have yet to make the impact he has been vehemently pursuing. He tried to include reform language in the Senate’s immigration legislation in 2013, but it was not approved. In 2015, he and Sen. Grassley introduced The American Job Creation and Investment Promotion Reform Act, but it was stifled in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Act would have given the Department of Homeland Security the authority to terminate projects based on concerns related to fraud or public safety. Leahy plans to reintroduce the bill this year.

Leahy has also proposed an EB-5 Integrity Fund to pay for site visits and federal audits to detect fraud. His legislation would require regional centers to pay an annual fee to support the fund. The senator has also proposed mandatory background checks for regional center administrators and project developers.

Leahy has pointed out that only a small portion EB-5 investments—about 3 percent—goes to rural areas, which contradicts one of the primary reasons for the program’s creation. To address the problem, the senator proposes a new formula for establishing Targeted Employment Areas.

If you are interested in petitioning for an EB-5 visa, turn to Kuck Immigration Partners for legal guidance. Call 404-816-8611 to schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney in Atlanta.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America.
The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds.
Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups:
Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans), we strongly rec…

LOS DERECHOS DE LOS EXTRANJEROS EN LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS

Todas las personas en los Estados Unidos, incluidos los extranjeros y aun los con ordenes de deportacion, tienen ciertos derechos básicos que deben ser respetados por los agentes de Inmigración y Aduanas (ICE). Estos derechos se derivan tanto de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. y las leyes de Estados Unidos. Como extranjero, usted tiene los siguientes derechos:

SU DERECHO A DENEGAR LA ENTRADA A SU CASA
Usted tiene el derecho de negar la entrada a un agente de ICE a su casa sin una orden válida. Esta orden debe ser firmado por un juez. Usted puede negarse a abrir la puerta, o se puede cerrar la puerta después de descubrir que el agente no tiene una orden válida. Los agentes del ICE generalmente no vienen con una orden judicial. Estos agentes suelen venir a la casa de alguien con una orden final de deportación, muy temprano en la mañana. Si alguien está golpeando en su puerta a las 6:00 am, no le es requerido abrir la puerta. Mirar fuera de primera. Si es un agente del gobierno, ust…

MY TOP 4 TAKEAWAYS FROM THIS WEEK'S TRUMP-INDUCED DREAMER NIGHTMARE

MY TOP 4 TAKEAWAYS FROM THIS WEEK'S TRUMP-INDUCED DREAMER NIGHTMARE

11.  Jeff Sessions is not only cold, smug and heartless, he also lies.  I may have cracked a molar grinding my teeth watching Sessions try not to smile as he gleefully read the statement that essentially ripped the heart out of 800,000 young people.  But what struck me the most were the blatant nativist lies and misinformation he spewed.  To name just a few: “DACA…contributed to a surge of minors at the southern border.”  Really?  So the surge didn’t start well before DACA due to the extreme violence and abject poverty in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala?  Or maybe those kids were just clairvoyant, and they saw DACA coming years in advance.  If the kids did in fact know about DACA, they would have known that they didn’t qualify unless they had been in the U.S. before 2007.      DACA granted immigrants “benefits, including participation in the Social Security program…”  This is patently false, unless by participati…