Skip to main content

Encarnacion Gives New Life to Fixing Erroneous Convictions In Georgia

By
In recent decades, America's immigration laws have changed to more closely resemble criminal ones. There are extreme burdens one must meet to stay in the U.S, regardless of family ties to the country or length of time spent here, and it is even harder to stay in the U.S. with a criminal record.
Due to the extreme nature of our current laws, the Supreme Court in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise their clients on the immigration consequences of their convictions in order to meet the standard of "effective assistance of counsel." This was a bold move for the Supreme Court; historically, defense attorneys did not have to advise of almost any consequences outside of the direct consequences of a conviction, such as your sentence and its terms.

Immigration law is extremely complex and takes years for attorneys to learn.  As a result, even after the Padilla ruling, not all criminal defense attorneys have been advising their clients correctly and immigrants still plea to crimes without understanding the potential immigration consequences. For years, immigration and criminal defense attorneys have been fighting to reopen the convictions of immigrants not properly advised of the immigration consequences of their convictions.  Yet, Georgia courts were extremely resistant, consistently denying petitions to reopen convictions that they should have granted. 

Recently, the Georgia Supreme Court made a decision enforcing Padilla v. Kentucky in Encarnacion v. State, No. S14A0690, slip op. (Ga. September 22, 2014). This decision requires that criminal defense attorneys, regardless of their expertise, advise immigrants as clearly as possible on the actual, real immigration consequences of their pleas and convictions. The Court makes clear, "It is not enough to say 'maybe' when the correct advice is 'almost certainly will.'" Encarnacion, No. S14A0690, at 8.

If you believe you were inaccurately advised as to the immigration consequences of your convictions, please call Anna Erwin at 404-949-8165 so I can help you with your case. I know the laws you need to fix your lives!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

By
Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans
231 comments
Read more

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

By
Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th
1 comment
Read more

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

By
If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their driver's licens
16 comments
Read more