Skip to main content

What You Need To Know About The "Line" in 2013

Four years ago, I wrote about the "Line" that determines how long it takes to immigrate to the United States.  The "line" was long then, and is longer now, with more than four million people waiting for an immigrant visa to become ready for them to immigrate to the United States.  There is a good number of these more than four million people already in the United States, either working under valid visas, or as undocumented members of our society.

An example is appropriate   We know from a recent meeting with the Department of States that there are approximately 44,000 EB-3 India cases with priority dates prior to August 2007.  Right now, the priority date (the date people who filed on that date can now apply for permanent residence) for India is November 22, 2002.  Available visas count both the principal applicant (the person who's job it is), PLUS each family member.  Hypothetically and because of "per-country limits," that means that if there are 3,000 EB-3 immigrant visas available each year to Indian nationals in this category, then only 1,000 to 1,500 actual families will get permanent residence, because 45% of visas are used by the principals, and 55% are used by their family members.

There are of course, more immigrant visas available in the India EB-3 category every year, because of flow down (and flow up) from other categories, but not many.  If you extrapolate these numbers, you come up with the conclusion that a person who files in February 2013 for an EB-3 India immigrant visa, with no change in the law, will have to wait more than 80 years to obtain permanent residence under a worst case scenario (but perhaps only 35 years under a best case scenario).  This goes to the main point, which is there is no real line.  80 (or even 35) years is a lifetime, not a line.  "Lines" like this actually cause undocumented immigration.

The good news is that there is a bill pending in Congress that will make this "line" into a useful piece of immigration management. Senate Bill S.169, sponsored by Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah and named the Immigration Innovation Act of 2013, adds immigrant visa numbers, does not count family members towards the actual visa limit, fixes the legal employment non-immigrant visa categories, eliminates per country quotas, and reduces overall wait times to manageable levels. This bill will certainly be part of any overall immigration reform that is passed, and more importantly can stand on its own if Congress is unable to pass a comprehensive immigration reform package. But we all need to make our voices heard.  Send a message to your Senator today to support S.169 and demand a restoration of sanity to our immigration system and an end to the "line."




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

How To Stop Illegal Immigration

In the midst of the never ending political season, we hear much rhetoric about immigration, and what candidates will "do" to fix what everyone considers to be a broken (not failed, just broken) immigration system.  Most of the candidates, however, put a condition on fixing this broken system by saying that:  "FIRST, we must secure the border and end illegal immigration, then we will talk."   What will it take to accomplish this precondition to solve a the acknowledged problem. There are two types of "illegal" immigration to the United States.  The first is what everyone already considers to be illegal immigration--those who enter the United States without a visa through our thousands of miles of borders.  Proposals to fix this particular type of illegal immigration range from alligators and moats, to automatic firing machine guns, to “beautiful” walls, to limitless numbers of border patrol agents.  The second type of "illegal" immigratio