Skip to main content

When your L-1B (or any other Employment-Based Petition) is Denied, Don’t File a Motion to Reopen – Take them to Federal Court!

By

We’ve all seen some of the hoops USCIS is making practitioners and employers jump through when trying to seek an L-1B (Specialized Knowledge Intracompany Transferee) approval for an employee and the daunting prospect of submitting a Motion to Reopen to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“CIS”) to challenge a wholly unfounded denial.  I think it goes without saying that filing a Motion to Reopen can not only be fruitless, but also be subject to what seems an endless processing time.
My most recent approval was just this scenario, and we took it to federal court instead – a denied L-1B, and after only a few short months a reopening of the denial, and a response to an RFE, we now have an approved L-1B success story.    

Fortunately, there is a much better alternative – look into filing a Declaratory Judgment Action in federal court.  It’s the best and most efficient way to challenge the decision AND make it an even playing field to argue your position.  I say that because CIS is put on notice that if they take a restrictive position on L-1B eligibility they will have to face the issue in federal court.  CIS rarely wants to be bothered with this, so they agree to settle by reopening and approving the petition, sometimes with an RFE first. 

Challenging USCIS in federal court has become fairly routine for me, and I have learned that it’s not only effective for L-1Bs, but for any employment-based petition so long as we feel it was in fact an approvable case and CIS simply misapplied the standards.  The other benefit is that the Petitioner is not required to go through the Motion to Reopen process before bringing directly into federal court.  It may seem intimidating to the employer, but is typically much more painless than the former. 

Please contact me at 404.949.8151 or dclaffey@immigration.net with any questions.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

By
Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans...
231 comments
Read more

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

By
Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th...
1 comment
Read more

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

By
If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their drive...
16 comments
Read more