Skip to main content

Cuando niegan su proceso de L-1B (o cualquier otra petición basada en el empleo), no presente una moción para reabrir su caso: Llévelos ante el Tribunal Federal.

By

Todos hemos visto algunos de los obstáculos que USCIS está realizando para los profesionales y empleadores al tratar de buscar una aprobación L-1B (Conocimiento especializado dentro del sector) para un empleado y la desalentadora posibilidad de presentar una Moción para reabrir su caso con Ciudadanía y servicios de Inmigración de EE. UU.  ("CIS") para desafiar una negación totalmente infundada. Creo que no hace falta decir que presentar una Moción para reabrir, no solo puede ser infructuoso, sino también estar sujeto a lo que parece ser un tiempo de procesamiento infinito.



Mi aprobación más reciente fue solo en este escenario, y lo llevamos al tribunal federal: un L-1B denegado, y después de solo unos pocos meses de una reapertura de la denegación y una respuesta de un RFE, tenemos un L-1B aprobado. Historia de éxito.

Afortunadamente, existe una alternativa mucho mejor: considerar la presentación de una Acción de Sentencia Declaratoria en una corte federal. Es la mejor y más eficiente forma de desafiar la decisión Y convertirla en un campo de juego para discutir su posición. Digo eso porque a CIS se le avisa que si toman una posición restrictiva sobre la elegibilidad L-1B tendrán que enfrentar el problema en la corte federal. CIS rara vez quiere molestarse con esto, por lo que acuerdan resolver al reabrir y aprobar la petición, a veces con un RFE primero.

Desafiar a USCIS en una corte federal se ha convertido en una rutina para mí, y he aprendido que no solo es efectivo para L-1Bs, sino para cualquier petición basada en empleo siempre que consideremos que en realidad fue un caso aprobado y CIS simplemente aplicó incorrectamente los estándares. El otro beneficio es que no se requiere que el peticionario pase por el proceso de Moción para reabrir antes de presentarlo directamente ante un tribunal federal. Puede parecer intimidante para el empleador, pero normalmente es mucho más indolora que la primera.

Por favor contácteme al 404.949.8151 o dclaffey@immigration.net con cualquier pregunta.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

By
Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans...
231 comments
Read more

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

By
Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th...
1 comment
Read more

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

By
If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their drive...
16 comments
Read more