As the result of recent litigation by the American Immigration Council, seeking through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) copies of USCIS training materials, a little gem was produced which goes a long way toward explaining USCIS hostility toward immigration attorneys. In a PowerPoint presentation entitled "USCIS Adjudicator Interaction with Private Attorneys and Representatives" USCIS takes what can only be called an intolerant tone toward attorneys, beginning with the supposition that attorneys are an annoyance that have be dealt with and ending with a joyous set of PowerPoint slides called "Why attorneys use confrontational or belligerent behavior."
Are you curious as to why USCIS thinks that attorneys use "confrontational or belligerent behavior" in an immigration interview? Well so am I, since I have never seen a lawyer do such a thing (or perhaps the folks at USCIS do not understand the difference between advocacy and belligerence?) Here are the four reasons given by USCIS:
- Misguided understanding of what it means to zealously represent a client;
- To fluster or intimidate adjudicators into giving up a line of questioning;
- To give their clients time to develop an answer to your question; and (my personal favorite)
- To impress clients and justify legal fees.
Noticeably absent from the stated reasons is the principal one I have encountered for an increase in rhetoric between an adjudications officer and an attorney, USCIS adjudicators do not understand the role of an attorney in USCIS interviews--making sure the USCIS officer follows the law. Far too often USCIS adjudicators fail to understand the law applicable to the benefit being sought. All too frequently USCIS adjudicators would rather ignore an attorney's attempt to correctly inform them of the law applicable in the particular case than accept the attorney's attempts for what they really are--an effort to get to a successful resolution of their client's case.