Skip to main content

Cynical Rollback Against Victims of Violence

Congress is currently trying to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) this week.

This Act, as it stands, allows battered spouses to petition for their own legal status, should they be in an extremely abusive relationship where their U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse has isolated them from friends and family, beaten them physically, verbally threatened them with deportation, sexually forced themselves onto them, psychologically demeaned them, and controlled all their marital finances. It is essentially a romantic and mutual relationship that turns into a slave-master relationship. The lack of status makes an awfully abusive relationship worse because the abusive spouse knows he can use the immigrant spouse's lack of a status as a tool to coerce, manipulate, and control.

It is not uncommon to hear an abuser tell their immigrant spouse, "If you call the police, they will never believe you because you are illegal - they will deport you and you will never see your children ever again." Even more frightening for victims involve instances that after they have done the right thing by calling the police and watching the abuser get arrested, they experience the agony of watching their abusive spouse get bonded out, to come back and threaten them. They are told that the police can do absolutely nothing to protect them from the violence, and that more harm will be done if they cooperate with law enforcement and the district attorney. Where can a battered spouse turn to for help? They have no place to live and no place to work, because the abusive spouse has taken their documentation and prevented them from working legally by refusing to petition for the battered spouse.  The victim has furthermore been isolated by the abuser from knowing anyone who could help. This is why VAWA was passed - to help those battered spouses in need.

This Act also authorizes immigrants who are victims of crime to receive a "U Visa" and eventually permanent residency, if they cooperate with law enforcement authorities as the victims of violent and qualifying crimes, and if they suffer substantial physical or psychological harm. My clients have in the past ranged from victims of domestic violence to survivors of attempted homicide. Congress believed it was important for law enforcement authorities to get all the help they needed, because immigrants are often afraid of cooperatng in a climate of deportation-only policies. These regulations encourage the immigrant community to come forth and cooperate with police, prosecutors, and judges, without fear of reprisal for their status. It is a win-win for the criminal to be investigated and prosecuted, and the victim to get temporary legal status on a path to permanent residency.

Cue in the proposed Republican House of Representative bill that was introduced recently (HR4970, Rep. Adams - R-FL). If passed, this bill would have a blizzard-iculously chilling effect on victims of domestic violence and crimes. In essence, the bill makes it nearly impossibly for a battered spouse to report abuse or a victim of a crime to obtain a U visa.

First, it would make it extremely difficult for abused aliens to self-petition for immigration relief. Government adjudicators will be able to inform the abuser of a battered spouse that they have been accused. Knowing this, battered spouses will be less likely to come forth and break the cycle of domestic violence. Does anyone envision the abuser saying, "Oh yes, Mr. US Citizenship and Immigration Services officer, I did beat my wife, threaten to deport her, and have repeatedly kept her from working by not filing for her documentation because I want a housewife who serves me?" Common sense dictates that the abusive spouse will not take responsibility for their abusive behavior, and will instead turn around and threaten, harm, and possibly kill their battered spouse for reporting them. Not to mention, an abusive spouse will be given more power to coerce their battered spouse and tell them, "if you do not stop applying for VAWA, I will tell them that you married me for the papers."  Do we really need to give abusive spouses more power?  This is a serious flaw in this bill.

Second, it would make U Visas more difficult to obtain. The victim would have to report a crime to the police within 60 days, cooperate on an active case with law enforcement, would have to identify the perpetrator or have information regarding the identity of the perpetrator, and would be out of luck if the statute of limitations lapsed on the crime embodied in the abuse. The bill would limit the benefit to those cases where the police have a perfect case to investigate and prosecute a suspect in custody within a certain time period.

In all seriousness, let's get real. The world does not reflect what we watch on CSI and crimes do not get solved within an hour. Cases take time to solve, for perpetrators to be identified, for victims to come forward, and prosecutions to be undertaken. Many of them are unsuccessful. Victims are often afraid and delay in reporting a crime. Police have limited resources and inactivate a case, though the victim was willing to cooperate fully. Perpetrators are not always identified in the dark. I have a client who was shot in the head from behind in a drive-by shooting and survived. His brother was fatally shot besides him. He would be denied a U Visa under this new bill. This bill will only lead to victims not reporting crimes and not being cooperative – the opposite of what we should be striving for to ensure safe communities.

The bill also states that the U Visa immigrant would not be able to seek permanent residency in four years. At this point, they will no longer have any status and likely be forwarded to removal proceedings for deportation. This does not encourage cooperation with law enforcement - in fact, it will hinder it. I do not foresee many victims saying, "I want to stay in the United States for four more years, so I can get deported along with my children in four years."

Why then push to make it harder for victims to obtain these benefits? My educated guess is that there is a misguided belief that there is too much fraud in immigrants who seek these benefits. In my opinion, there is very little evidence to support this assertion to, so as to raise the standard to obtain these benefits and to limit these benefits.  The standard to obtain a VAWA benefit and a U Visa is already high enough and require vast amounts of evidence, when often there is little.

Victims of violence deserve compassion, not suspicion. This bill in the House of Representative only makes a difficult and tragic situation worse for thousands of victims. I encourage you to take action and notify your representative that the system of adjudicating VAWA petitions and U Visas was already working, albeit not perfectly, and to vote against the House version of the bill. If you do not know who your representative is, please go to If you would like to send a template email to your representative against the bill, please go to


  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America.
The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds.
Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups:
Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans), we strongly rec…

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence.

The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their driver's licens…


Todas las personas en los Estados Unidos, incluidos los extranjeros y aun los con ordenes de deportacion, tienen ciertos derechos básicos que deben ser respetados por los agentes de Inmigración y Aduanas (ICE). Estos derechos se derivan tanto de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. y las leyes de Estados Unidos. Como extranjero, usted tiene los siguientes derechos:

Usted tiene el derecho de negar la entrada a un agente de ICE a su casa sin una orden válida. Esta orden debe ser firmado por un juez. Usted puede negarse a abrir la puerta, o se puede cerrar la puerta después de descubrir que el agente no tiene una orden válida. Los agentes del ICE generalmente no vienen con una orden judicial. Estos agentes suelen venir a la casa de alguien con una orden final de deportación, muy temprano en la mañana. Si alguien está golpeando en su puerta a las 6:00 am, no le es requerido abrir la puerta. Mirar fuera de primera. Si es un agente del gobierno, ust…