Skip to main content

Challenged: ACLU Filed a Law Suit against ICE for Shackling Immigrants during Court


The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) recently filed a lawsuit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other law enforcement agencies to challenge the practice of shackling immigrants before being led into a courtroom.  See “ACLU Sues ICE for Shackling Immigrants in Court”, http://www.newamericamedia.org, May 14, 2012.  The lawsuit was filed on the basis that there would be an unfair perception of detained immigrants as violent criminals if they are handcuffed.  

Further, the lawsuit claims that being handcuffed deprives a detainee’s rights to fair representation and equal rights while in court in that communication with their attorneys will be more difficult, and they would also deprived of the right to take any notes during their proceedings.

One of the most obvious issues with this unfair practice is that it is well-established that only violent criminals are subject to being handcuffed, so of course, there is an automatic perception that each of these immigrant detainees is comparable to a violent offender.  Statistically speaking, ICE compiled evidence which shows that 95 percent of immigrant detainees do not have violent felony records. 

So, why do ICE and other law enforcement agencies insist on shackling immigrant detainees where the vast majority are not violent offenders?  It is for the same reason the majority of Americans who are on the other side of the immigration debate insist that immigrants in the United States without lawful status are automatically criminals, that all immigrants without status don’t pay taxes, that they don’t contribute positively to society, and that they only deplete our society of valuable resources and benefits.  It is our country’s misconception that undocumented immigrants are bad people simply because they might be residing in the U.S. without legal status.  And so it must also be our country’s misconception that an individual who flees horrific circumstances in their own country to seek safety and a dream in the U.S. can only be a bad person.  Maybe if immigrants are shackled in the courts of our country, it will be easier for a judge, a prosecutor, a juror, and a member of the public to view them as a criminal so they can justify separating these people from their families, or sending a child back to a country he or she has not seen since before they had the ability to even form memories?  It is always easier to dismiss an individual who doesn’t appear deserving of compassion – surely a person in handcuffs cannot be a hardworking father who works in a factory sixteen hours a day to support his children, so they can benefit from the educational opportunities that he never had.  Right?  For those who oppose the rights of immigrants in this country, it does seem the easier solution.

These are the very reasons why it is a violation of where our country’s morals should be for law enforcement agencies to paint the picture of an undocumented immigrant as an individual who is simply a hardened, dangerous criminal.  A perfect example is an article where a woman was kept in handcuffs in the custody of ICE after being the victim of domestic violence in Brazil where she was bound and raped by her abusive husband and his brother.  In this situation, who is the one actually engaging in the violence?  Who is the one more closely associated with her violent husband in Brazil?  Is it the woman who is being handcuffed in much the same manner, or is it the agency compounding the violent acts this woman suffered already?  She escaped to the United States to beg for protection from a horrific situation just to walk right back into the hands of her attackers.  Is that really what our country means when we insist that our immigration laws are meant to protect those that are fleeing persecution in their home countries?

We can only hope that the ACLU is successful in arguing that there is no justifiable reason for an immigrant detainee without a violent criminal record to be visibly restrained by shackles for all of the world to judge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America.
The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds.
Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups:
Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans), we strongly rec…
Si usted es inmigrante (incluso un ciudadano de los EE.UU.), aquí hay 9 cosas que usted debe saber.

¿Es usted un ciudadano estadounidense naturalizado, residente legal permanente, titular de una visa o inmigrante indocumentado? Le recomendamos que tome los siguientes pasos para protegerse de nuestra versión actual de América.
Las últimas semanas hemos recordado a los inmigrantes, incluso a los ciudadanos estadounidenses naturalizados, que no nacieron en los Estados Unidos. Nuestra oficina ha recibido innumerables llamadas telefónicas, mensajes de correo electrónico y mensajes de medios sociales de personas preocupadas por el futuro de su familia en los Estados Unidos.
La mayoría de gente quiere saber qué puede hacer ahora para protegerse de lo que promete ser una ola de actividad anti-inmigración por parte del gobierno federal. La orden ejecutiva de Trump sobre la aplicación de la ley interior tiene algunas disposiciones que deberían hacer temblar a la mayoría de los estadounidenses. …

The DOJ Raised The Penalty Fee for Immigration Law Violations--Including Employer Sanctions

The Department of Justice announced an increase in fines for violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as the pertain to those sections that account for fraud, document abuse, and unfair immigration-related employment practices. While this is only an adjustment for inflation, it brings home the point that that poorly or incorrectly completing immigration forms, like the Form I-9, can lead to very costly fines from ICE and the Immigration Court. If you have any questions or concerns about I-9s in your company, please call the attorneys and Kuck Immigration Partners.  We have decades of experience representing employers in the ICE and DOL immigration investigations.  You can reach us at 404-816-8611 or at ckuck@Immigration.net.  




U.S.C. citation

Name/description

CFR citation DOJ penalty assessed after 8/1/2016 ($) 1 DOJ penalty assessed after 2/3/2017 ($) 2 8 U.S.C.     IRCA; Unfair immigration-related employment practices, document abuse (per individual discriminated against).     …