Skip to main content

Don’t Forget Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Immigration Reform


The attributes that motivate an immigrant to leave behind the familiar surroundings of home and pursue a better life in another country, often at considerable risk of personal loss, are akin to the attributes of an entrepreneur who takes the initiative to pursue new business ventures, often at considerable risk of financial loss.  Stated another way--immigration is an entrepreneurial act.

It is therefore not surprising that immigrants to the United States and their children have made some of the most significant contributions to the U.S. economy.  Consider these findings from a recent report published by the Partnership for a New American Economy:
  • More than 40% of the 2010 Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children.
  •  Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants or children of immigrants employed more than 10 million people worldwide.
  • The Fortune 500 companies that boast immigrant or children-of-immigrant founders have combined revenues of $4.2 trillion – a figure greater than the GDP of every country in the world except the U.S., China, and Japan.
  •  Seven of the ten most valuable brands in the world come from American companies founded by immigrants or children of immigrants.
Yet the outdated U.S. immigration system does not always welcome immigrant entrepreneurs with open arms and an efficient and predictable process for them and their families to attain lawful immigration status so they can focus on starting new companies and creating new jobs.  While there are temporary and permanent visas available to immigrant entrepreneurs (e.g., temporary visas for nationals of certain countries coming to the U.S. to engage in substantial trade or to make substantial investments [E1 or E2 visas, respectively]; and a permanent visa or so called “Green Card” for those who invest between $500,000 and $1 million in a new commercial enterprise that creates at least 10 full-time jobs [popularly known as EB-5]), the often cumbersome and time-consuming application process to obtain these visas, coupled with their demanding requirements and shifting and sometimes unpredictable adjudication standards, make pursuing these visas unpalatable for entrepreneurs who are accustomed to moving quickly and efficiently.

Fortunately, the U.S. government recognizes this problem and has started taking steps to make the system more entrepreneur-friendly.  U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has implemented the Entrepreneurs in Residence (EIR) program where real-world immigrant entrepreneurs advise USCIS about how entrepreneurs operate in the real world and how USCIS can make visa programs more entrepreneur-friendly.  It has also recently introduced an online resource called Entrepreneur Pathways: A Resource for Immigrant Entrepreneurs to help immigrant entrepreneurs navigate the complicated U.S. immigration system.

These are steps in the right direction, but more must be done.  As Congress engages in the much-needed process of overhauling and modernizing the country’s outdated and broken immigration system, one of the pillars of reform must address the immigrant entrepreneur.

The managing director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and a senior lecturer in the MIT Sloan School of Management recently shared in the Forbes Leadership Forum and the Huffington Post their observations about this problem and their ideas for how to address it.  These gentlemen, who teach an introductory entrepreneurship class at MIT, observe that U.S. immigration policy is killing entrepreneurship.  They note that if the three in 10 students at MIT, including four in 10 graduate students, who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents want to start their own company in the U.S., there are few viable options, if any, for them to do so and remain lawfully in the United States.  They astutely observe:  

Innovation-driven entrepreneurs are the engine of a vibrant economy. Their high levels of education and their pursuit of global markets and rapid expansion create jobs and economic prosperity. And many of them, such as these MIT students, were not born in the United States. There is a global competition to recruit this talent, and countries such as Canada, Singapore, and Australia have introduced policies that are far more welcoming than ours. Although strides have been made in retaining immigrant science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students, these measures are largely designed to let immigrants to fill jobs in existing companies. Would-be immigrant entrepreneurs still face major obstacles and uncertainty.

They recommend we consider three areas to make it easier for immigrant entrepreneurs to start American companies and create American jobs:
  1. Focus not just on skilled immigrants filling positions in existing companies, but also on immigrants who want to create new companies.
  2. Appreciate the talent of these entrepreneurs rather than making them feel like aliens.  (Unfortunately, I have found this is how many immigrants feel, regardless of their skill or talent level.)
  3. Shape the immigration laws, regulations, and application processes and procedures so they are more responsive to the needs of foreign talent in an increasingly competitive global market. 

The 21st century American economy needs a 21st Century immigration policy so that the U.S. has a competitive advantage, not disadvantage, in the global competition for talent.  As we move forward, we must include in our national discussion about immigration reform how our immigration policies can be adapted to be more responsive to the needs of immigrant entrepreneurs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their driver's licens