Skip to main content

Immigration Wants to be Your Friend

Recently U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a memo to its immigration officers explaining how to do “unannounced cyber site-visits” on petitioners and beneficiaries of applications filed with the agency. That's right, Immigration wants to be Your Friend! Now Immigration intends to look at your social network to check up on you, and possibly use what they find against you in an effort to deny your application.

The memo advises immigration officers on how to set up profiles on social networking sites (e.g.. Facebook, Myspace, Hi5, Buzznet, etc.), and search for petitioner and beneficiaries on cases they are reviewing. This virtual visit, as detailed by USCIS, “provides an excellent vantage point for [immigration fraud investigators] to observe the daily life of beneficiaries and petitioners who are suspected of fraudulent activities.” You also need to understand that USCIS supposes that every petition presented to them is fraudulent, so USCIS will be doing their “research” on many different types cases.

Clearly, immigration applicants should use extreme caution (and common-sense) when setting up a profile on any social-networking site. Here are a few guidelines;

  • Don’t make your social page public;
  • Don’t accept requests from people you do not know;
  • Don’t put yours or your spouse’s personal information on social networking sites; and
  • Don’t address your personal, relationship issues, in the world of social media.

Immigration Officers have free reign to ask (almost) any question to a petitioner or a beneficiary at an interview. Adjudicators can come to your house and check on the "bona fides" of your relationship. Now adjudicators will also “follow” you on-line; but, do you really want to be their “friend”?

Comments

  1. The contents of the 2008 USCIS leaked memo set an alarming precedent for the methods that FDNS will use to detect immigration fraud. By connecting social media and immigration fraud, USCIS - and more specifically, FDNS - is losing credibility in my eyes. FDNS officers will have to take the information posted on a US visa applicant's social networking webpage as truth in order to use the information as evidence in an immigration fraud case. The reality is there is no way to prove what people write on Facebook, Twitter, or any other social networking site. A person can make an entirely false persona for themselves and never think of the consequences. The memo encourages immigration officers to construct presumably credible cases around unverifiable information. Visa applicants who currently use social media to keep in touch with their families and friends should be extremely careful, because anything they write could be interpreted in an unintended way. It is also crucial for applicants to tighten their privacy settings on social networking sites. I am hoping that this memo will not bear much weight on FDNS investigations; however, it will be difficult to determine how frequently this method is used and how much significance is given to it. For now, we should all be very selective about who we call our "friends".

    ReplyDelete
  2. The contents of the 2008 USCIS leaked memo set an alarming precedent for the methods that FDNS will use to detect immigration fraud. By connecting social media and immigration fraud, USCIS - and more specifically, FDNS - is losing credibility in my eyes. FDNS officers will have to take the information posted on a US visa applicant's social networking webpage as truth in order to use the information as evidence in an immigration fraud case. The reality is there is no way to prove what people write on Facebook, Twitter, or any other social networking site. A person can make an entirely false persona for themselves and never think of the consequences. The memo encourages immigration officers to construct presumably credible cases around unverifiable information. Visa applicants who currently use social media to keep in touch with their families and friends should be extremely careful, because anything they write could be interpreted in an unintended way. It is also crucial for applicants to tighten their privacy settings on social networking sites. I am hoping that this memo will not bear much weight on FDNS investigations; however, it will be difficult to determine how frequently this method is used and how much significance is given to it. For now, we should all be very selective about who we call our "friends".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

How To Stop Illegal Immigration

In the midst of the never ending political season, we hear much rhetoric about immigration, and what candidates will "do" to fix what everyone considers to be a broken (not failed, just broken) immigration system.  Most of the candidates, however, put a condition on fixing this broken system by saying that:  "FIRST, we must secure the border and end illegal immigration, then we will talk."   What will it take to accomplish this precondition to solve a the acknowledged problem. There are two types of "illegal" immigration to the United States.  The first is what everyone already considers to be illegal immigration--those who enter the United States without a visa through our thousands of miles of borders.  Proposals to fix this particular type of illegal immigration range from alligators and moats, to automatic firing machine guns, to “beautiful” walls, to limitless numbers of border patrol agents.  The second type of "illegal" immigratio