Skip to main content

Have I been “convicted” of a crime?

Most people think that you can only have a “conviction” on your record if you plea guilty to a crime or are found guilty at trial. And even then, you might hear that if you “pay everything” or have no problems on probation that your record will be clean. Right? WRONG! You do not have to plead guilty to a crime, or even be charged with one, to have a conviction under the immigration laws.

What immigration considers a "conviction"

Under ​INA 101(a​)(​48)(A)​, immigration defines conviction as:
“a formal judgment of guilt of the alien entered by a court or,
if adjudication of guilt has been withheld, where - (i) a judge or jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or
has admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt, and (ii) the judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien's liberty to be imposed.
Wait – a conviction even “if adjudication of guilty has been withheld”? Immigration doesn’t consider whether or not the judge even actually announced you guilty as long as you presented a plea or were found guilty at trial. A “suspended sentence” will not save you from having a conviction either. If you plea guilty or are found guilty at trial, even if the judge suspends your entire sentence, you will have a conviction.

Even if I don’t enter a plea but “had admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt”? Yes, that means if you talk to police and admit doing drugs, it doesn’t matter if you’re convicted in court or even charged. Immigration could consider you convicted just based on the facts in the report. So be careful!

Always have a lawyer who does crimmigration before talking to law enforcement, including immigration law enforcement.

First Offender and Conditional Discharge

In Georgia, you can present a guilty plea under special programs called “First Offender” or “Conditional Discharge.” If you complete all requirements and probation successfully without violations under either program, the judge will not accept your guilty plea. Simply put, the plea is never entered into the system with the court. On your criminal record it will state you enter a plea of guilty under First Offender or Conditional Discharge, but under “Adjudication” it will state “Adjudication Withheld,” not “guilty.” Because that plea you made was not accepted by the court. You can honestly say under STATE law that you have not been convicted of a crime.

However, Immigration STILL counts a First Offender or Conditional Discharge as a plea of guilty because remember how you had to present a plea to get into either program? A plea of guilty that the court could have accepted if you messed up and violated the terms? That plea, although never accepted by the court, is admitting “sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt” and is considered a conviction under the immigration laws.


Pardons

Full pardons under Georgia law also do not erase convictions under the immigration laws. This will be expanded upon at another time.


Pre-Trial Diversion (Pre-Trial Intervention, PTD, PTIT) – Your only friend


In Georgia, completion of a pre-trial diversion program is not considered a “conviction” under the immigration laws. When you enter into pre-trial diversion, you do not speak to the judge or enter a plea of guilty. You only talk to the prosecutor and the whole program is through the prosecutor’s office. Once you successfully complete the program (payment of a fine, class, community service, etc.), the prosecutor goes to the court and says the State does not wish to press charges against the Defendant. So the case is dismissed. Diversion “diverts” the defendant from ever having a plea or trial and you do not have to admit any guilt to get into pre-trial diversion. Therefore you will NOT have a conviction under the immigration laws if you complete pre-trial diversion.

Anna Erwin, Esq.
Criminal and Immigration Defense

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans...

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th...

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their drive...