Skip to main content

USCIS Proposes New Rule - International Startups Get Ready!

We welcome today’s announcement by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) which released the “International Entrepreneur Rule”. This is a proposal of a new rule which will allow certain international entrepreneurs to be considered for temporary permission to enter the United States (parole). This proposed rule has significant implications, not only for the thousands of potential entrepreneurs who may not ordinarily consider investing in the United States, particularly if unable to obtain a visa in the first place, but for our economy. USCIS acknowledged the benefits America has enjoyed in today’s proposal. “America’s economy has long benefited from the contributions of immigrant entrepreneurs, from Main Street to Silicon Valley,” said Director León Rodríguez. “This proposed rule, when finalized, will help our economy grow by expanding immigration options for foreign entrepreneurs who meet certain criteria for creating jobs, attracting investment and generating revenue in the U.S.”
The proposed rule would allow entrepreneurs to apply for entry to the United States and an initial stay of up to two years to oversee and grow their startup entity. A request for re-parole (up to 3 additional years) would be considered if the entrepreneur and the startup entity continues to establish a significant public benefit, which can be demonstrated through substantial increases in capital investment, revenue, or job creation. The Department of Homeland Security would review the applications on a case-by-case basis, but generally the eligible entrepreneurs of startup enterprises should have:
1)      Significant (at least 15%) ownership interest in the startup and have an active and central role to its operations;
2)      A recent startup (formed in the U.S. within the past 3 years);
3)      A startup that has demonstrated substantial potential for rapid business grown and job creation. This can be evidenced by the following
a.      Receiving significant investment of capital (at least $345,000) from certain qualified U.S. investors with established records of successful investments;
b.      Receiving significant awards or grants (at least $100,000) from certain federal, state or local government entities; or
c.       Partially satisfying one or both of the above criteria in addition to other reliable and compelling evidence of the startup entity’s substantial potential for rapid growth and job creation.
This would not be the only way an entrepreneur could try and obtain, through their investment in the U.S. economy, an immigration benefit. Some may be familiar with one such program: EB-5 Investor Visa. The Eb-5 visa is discussed in more detail HERE however this proposed rule does not replace the Eb-5 program, which requires an investment of $1 million (in certain cases as low as $500,000) in exchange for lawful permanent residency for the foreign investor and his/her family. Contrasted with the rule proposed today, the EB-5 visa requires a more significant financial investment and the conditions are stringent and particular and will potentially take more time to adjudicate, however significantly the Eb-5 visa offers a benefit that cannot be compared: permanent residency.
This program would be perfect for the startup that is serious about investing in the U.S. and wants the ability to personally oversee their startup but is not yet ready or interested in permanent residency, or at least not right away.

There will be a 45 day commentary period following the publication in the Federal Register. We will post an update on this blog with more information as it develops and we urge the public to comment in support of the proposed International Entrepreneur Rule when released. We have witnessed our world grow increasingly smaller with advancements in science and technology in the past few decades. Forward-thinking immigration rules such as the one proposed can only position the U.S. for all kinds of growth in an ever-shrinking world.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans...

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th...

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their drive...