Skip to main content

What is Prosecutorial Discretion and How Does It Work?


 
Prosecutorial Discretion (casually referred to as “PD”) occurs when the Department of Homeland Security exercises its discretion in granting some form of benefit to a foreign national. In such cases, the foreign national is typically not entitled to a benefit or relief as a matter of law, but the Department agrees to use its discretion in favor of the applicant anyway.

PD can come in many ways and can be the result of different facts specific to an applicant’s case. For example, if you are in removal proceedings (meaning, you are currently attending hearings in front of an Immigration Judge), the Department can agree to administratively close your case, reopen your case (if you previously had a removal order), or terminate your proceedings altogether. If you are not in removal proceedings, then PD can come in the way of a grant of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), Deferred Action (for people who do not fall under Obama’s DACA regulations), or a grant of a stay of removal (this comes after an order of removal and allows you to have a work permit).

Benefits and Disadvantages of Prosecutorial Discretion

The benefits of PD are obvious: you are no longer in removal proceedings, you no longer have to show up to court hearings, or you no longer have an order of removal. Obtaining PD in these cases allow you to continue a relatively normal life without the worry of imminent deportation.

The disadvantage is mainly that closing or terminating removal proceedings, while allowing you to stay indefinitely in the U.S. (with or without a work permit in some cases), will not get you a green card because you will not be having a final hearing; you would be instead choosing to stop all hearings indefinitely.

Who can and cannot get PD?

This is not an absolute answer because, after all, obtaining PD is within the COMPLETE discretion of the Department’s.  Generally, respondents who obtain PD are able to do so because of sympathetic circumstances (ill relatives, long residence in the U.S., lack of criminal record, etc.), while respondents who do not obtain PD have aggravating factors like serious criminal records, removal orders, recent—and/or several—entries to the U.S., etc.

A respondent maximizes his or her chances of obtaining PD by having an attorney because the attorney is the one who can negotiate with the government attorneys and the Immigration Judge. Respondents with no attorney are taking a big gamble because they generally do not have the same access an attorney would have to the judges or the government attorneys. 

If you think your case has sympathetic factors like the ones mentioned above, you may benefit from Prosecutorial Discretion, but you will likely need an attorney to negotiate with the government. You can contact our firm to discuss your options.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

How To Stop Illegal Immigration

In the midst of the never ending political season, we hear much rhetoric about immigration, and what candidates will "do" to fix what everyone considers to be a broken (not failed, just broken) immigration system.  Most of the candidates, however, put a condition on fixing this broken system by saying that:  "FIRST, we must secure the border and end illegal immigration, then we will talk."   What will it take to accomplish this precondition to solve a the acknowledged problem. There are two types of "illegal" immigration to the United States.  The first is what everyone already considers to be illegal immigration--those who enter the United States without a visa through our thousands of miles of borders.  Proposals to fix this particular type of illegal immigration range from alligators and moats, to automatic firing machine guns, to “beautiful” walls, to limitless numbers of border patrol agents.  The second type of "illegal" immigratio