Skip to main content

Update On The In-State Tuition Final Order And Status of Tuition Payments

On Friday, January 6, 2017, the Board of Regents filed an appeal to the Court of Appeals (under a new law change that directs Mandamus appeals (like this one) to the Court of Appeals instead of the Supreme Court (as of January 1, 2017).  This appeal does NOT stay the judge's Final Order compelling the Board of Regents to permit DACA recipients to pay in-state tuition.

Also on Friday, January 6, 2017, the Board of Regents filed a "Application for Supersedeas," which means they acknowledge their is no automatic stay and they are asking the Court to put the Final Order on hold during the time the appeal is pending (which will take months). Within three hours of receiving it, I have filed an Opposition and Response to that Application, but as many of you know, the Court's are now closed because of the winter storm.  I expect, however, that the judge will rule on the Application, either granting it or denying it, on either Monday or Tuesday.

If the judge does not rule on the Application on Monday, or if she denies the Board of Regents Application, then on Tuesday the state MUST except in-state tuition payments for qualified DACA students, and, of course, return any monies already overpaid for out-of-state tuition when in-state tuition should have been paid.  If the judge grants the Board of Regents Application, all DACA students will have pay out-of-state tuition until the appeals process completes (or if DACA is ended by President Trump).

So for this weekend, let's all put our good thoughts toward a positive outcome on this case for our students.  Education should not be inaccessible.  We are doing what we can to make sure it is not.  

Comments

  1. Thank you for keeping us up to date . . . Have a wonderful weekend

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for keeping us informed . . Have a great weekend.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their driver's licens