Skip to main content

Que Importa Tiene La No Decision de DAPA y Expansion de DACA?

By
Hay muchas personas que estas confundidas con la decisión de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en el caso de DAPA y DACA.  Para resolver todas sus inquietudes, voy a contestar las preguntas más comunes con referencia al tema.
  •  Cual fue la decisión de la Corte Suprema de Justicia y que significa?    La Corte Suprema de Justicia decidió no tomar una decisión en el caso.  El caso no trataba de decidir si el DAPA and DACA eran legales y constitucionales sino de decidir si el Juez del Distrito de Texas podía suspender esos programas temporalmente hasta que el tomara la decisión final.  
  •  La decisión de la Corte Suprema de Justicia acaba por completo el DACA, DAPA, y DACA ampliada?   El DAPA y la expansión de DACA están temporalmente suspendido hasta que la corte del Distrito de Texas tome una decisión final.  La corte del Distrito de Texas no tomara la decisión hasta en el otoño.  Es más seguro que la corte del distrito suspenda el DAPA y la expansión de DACA permanente.  Si eso pasa, la decisión será apelada en la corte federal y después en la Corte Suprema de Justicia.  Esta vez ya la corte tendrá 9 juezes en vez de 8 juezes. Esto pasaría solemnemente si Hilary Clinton ganara la presidencia. Obviamente, si Donald Trump ganaría la presidencia, DAPA y DACA serian permanente cancelado.
  • Cuáles son los recursos legales que quedan al gobierno en este caso?      El Gobierno tiene que tratar y convencer el juez original del Distrito de Texas, que Obama tiene el derecho de hacer lo que hizo.  Obviamente, no van a poder ganar este caso con este juez.  La mejor opción sería que Obama publique una regla formal en el proceso legal, en vez de publicar memorandas a sus empleados.  Francamente, dudo que Obama lo hara ya que Obama tiene otras prioridades que no incluyen ayudar a millones de inmigrantes en el país. 
  • Cuál es el fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en 4 a favor y 4 en contra?   El fallo es simple.  El Juez Jefe Roberts decidió que era más importante de parar la decisión de Obama en vez de quedar con sus principios y demandar evidencias de las consecuencias inventadas por el estado de Texas para llevar sus quejas.  Francamente, estoy muy desilusionado en este Juez.  Yo pensé que él tenía más respecto a la sistema que esto.  En las palabras de Trump: Triste.  



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

By
Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans...
231 comments
Read more

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

By
Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th...
1 comment
Read more

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

By
If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their drive...
16 comments
Read more