Skip to main content

VisaGate 2015 -- How the Obama Administration Again Deceived Immigrants

By

In early September 2015, the Visa Bulletin contained a new second set of dates.  First, there were the dates for those who could be approved for permanent residence.  Second, there was a set of dates for those would while not currently approvable, could file for adjustment of status to be approved in the near future. This was a major change in the Visa Bulletin, and was welcomed by everyone in the immigrant community. The reason this change was so welcome was because people who could file for adjustment of status could then obtain work permits and in some cases travel documents that were no longer tied to the employer or sponsor.  It was a partial fulfillment of the promises made by President Obama on November 20, 2015. 

But, like virtually everything else President Obama has done, it turned into a complete bait and switch.  On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 4:30 in the afternoon, less than three weeks after first publishing the visa bulletin with the welcome changes and new filing dates, and after hundreds of thousands of people has spent millions of collective dollars preparing green card applications and obtaining medical exams, the USCIS and the DOS changed the dates that they would except for filing.  These new dates included virtually no one who was eligible to apply.  It was a classic Obama administration deception—say one thing, but do another. 

This time, however, the immigration bar did not take this lying down.  Immediately a group of lawyers, led by nationally renowned immigration lawyers Greg Siskind, Robert Gibbs, Robert Pauw, and Andrew Free brought a class action lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State (DOS) and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).  The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (www.abil.com), of which our firm is a founding member, has lent key assistance to the lawsuit. And, our firm has participated in this action by serving as an expert declarant on the issue of how the Visa Bulletin has historically been accurate in predicting availability of permanent residence and in using available visa numbers (at least from a Department of State perspective). 


We do not yet know what will happen with this lawsuit, but we do that there is a request today for a Temporary Restraining Order to allow individuals to file their applications while the court decides the matter. We will keep our clients information of their options. If you think that you are affected by this change in plans by USCIS, please contact your attorney at Kuck Immigration Partners and we can review your immigration options under this lawsuit. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

By
Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans...
231 comments
Read more

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

By
Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th...
1 comment
Read more

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

By
If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their drive...
16 comments
Read more