Skip to main content

Dealing with ESTA, Prior Visa Applications and The Visa Waiver Process

Having your country be part of the ESTA, or Visa Waiver program to come the United States is a wonderful thing!  But like many good things, there is a downside. The downside to ESTA is in not disclosing all prior visa refusals (which may make you permanently ineligible to use ESTA), even if you do not know you were refused a visa!  Huh?  Is it possible that I was refused a visa at an U.S. Consulate and do not know it?  Oh, yes it is. 

In an advisory sent out today by the American Immigration Lawyers Association, there are at least TWO instances in which a person could have had a visa refused, and not know or understand what has happened.
Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") may deem the failure to disclose visa refusals for administrative processing or incorrect visa category on the Form DS-160 as a misrepresentation when completing the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) form, which could make the applicant inadmissible under INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i). Therefore, when filing the ESTA form, you should report visa “refusals” as “denials” when refusals are for § 221(g) administrative processing or for selecting the incorrect visa category on Form DS-160.
1.  Administrative Processing
The Department of State (DOS) treats a consular officer’s decision to suspend a visa application for administrative processing under INA § 221(g) as a visa refusal. This is true even though the administrative processing notice frequently asks for documents or other information, and after those materials are submitted, the visa is granted.
Because DOS treats the suspension for administrative processing as a refusal, United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requires that such refusals be reported on the ESTA application. The ESTA application asks “Have you ever been denied a U.S. visa or entry into the U.S. or had a U.S. visa canceled?” If the applicant’s visa application is under administrative processing by a consular post, the applicant should answer “yes” to this question on ESTA. CBP will manually review the ESTA application to determine whether the applicant is eligible for travel. Generally, CBP will issue a decision on such applications within 72 hours of submission. 
2.  Preparation of New DS-160 Due to Incorrect Choice of Visa Classification
If a visa applicant does not select the correct visa category on Form DS-160, the consular officer may require the applicant to complete a new Form DS-160 with the correct visa category before the visa may be issued. As to the Form DS-160 submitted with the incorrect visa category selection, the consular officer may enter a § 221(g) notation in its system. Because of this possibility, even if the applicant is not told that the consular officer has entered such a notation, the applicant should also disclose a visa refusal on ESTA as a denial and explain the circumstances in the space provided.
Tips for ESTA Applications - Responding to Question F: “Have you ever been denied a U.S. visa or entry into the U.S. or had a U.S. visa canceled?”
  •  If a person’s nonimmigrant visa application has been referred for “Administrative Processing” by a consular officer and is still in that status, the visa applicant should answer “Yes” to the above question on ESTA and explain.
  • If, at the request of a consular officer, a visa applicant has completed a new Form DS-160 to correct the visa category stated on a submitted Form DS-160, that person should answer “Yes” to the above question on ESTA and explain.
  • If  a person has ever applied for a U.S. visa and has not or did not receive the visa for any reason, the traveler should answer “Yes” to the above question on ESTA and explain.
So, if you are applying to use the ESTA program and have previously applied for a U.S. visa.  make sure you understand what happened BEFORE answering the online forms from CBP to obtain your ESTA clearance.  You can save yourself a lot of headaches by making sure you answer the form correctly.  In the U.S. immigration process, there is rarely a second chance.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Are An Immigrant (even a US Citizen), Here Are 9 Things You Should Know

Are you a Naturalized U.S. Citizen, Lawful Permanent Resident, Visa Holder, or an Undocumented Immigrant? We recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself in our current version of America. The last couple of weeks have reminded immigrants, even naturalized U.S. citizens, that they were not born in the United States. Our office has received countless phone calls, emails, and social media messages from people worrying about what their family’s future in the United States holds. Most people want to know what they can do now to protect themselves from what promises to be a wave of anti-immigration activity by the federal government. Trump's Executive Order on Interior Enforcement has some provisions that should make most Americans shiver.  We recommend the following actions for each of the following groups: Naturalized U.S. citizens. In particular if you have a foreign accent, and you are traveling within 100 miles of any US Border (including the oceans

Seven Reasons Why the Georgia Legislature Should Repeal HB-87

Recently the Alabama Attorney General called on the Alabama State Legislature to repeal parts of Alabama's horrid anti-immigration law ( HB 56), because of the "unintended" consequences of the bill (frankly, what happened was not unintended). Because of the similarity between the two laws, Georgia's Speaker of the House, David Ralston was asked whether Georgia Legislature would repeal part or all of HB 87, Georgia own anti-immigration law. HB 87 has caused almost a half a billion dollars in damage to the Georgia economy (along with untold suffering in Georgia's immigrant communities) without any noted or reported positive effect. Speaker Ralston plainly stated that the Georgia Legislature would NOT do anything to repeal HB 87 . While it understandable why a politician would not admit that a pet bill he shepherded and pushed through the state legislature was simply bad law, it is also clear that Speaker Ralston is facing a challenge on his RIGHT in th

Why is USCIS Taking So Long to Renew DACA Work Permits?

If the calls to our office are any indicator, there are thousands of DACA recipients whose work permit applications were filed at least three months prior to expiration, who are still waiting for their renewed work permits.  Without renewed permits, these individuals lose the right to work legally, the right to drive, and may once again accrue unlawful presence. The DHS published a notice in October 2014 advising DACA recipients that they could file their request for extension up to 150 days (5 months) prior to expiration.  As with all things government, very few of the DACA recipients, who tend not to frequent government websites, knew about the memo and many did not file so far before expiration perhaps thinking that extending a work permit was a like extending a drivers license, its is done in a few minutes.  As an experienced immigration lawyer will tell you, the USCIS does nothing quickly, and certainly does not worry that a person may lose their job or their driver's licens